Biden's War Hawks

Biden's Foreign Policy Picks Are From the Hawkish National Security Blob.

Posted In: Politics, National,   From Issue 907   By: Robert E Martin

07th January, 2021     0

While Donald Trump was certainly the most besieged and criticized President occupying the Oval Office in modern history, despite all his foibles he was able to negotiate four different peace deals in the Mideast.  However, President-Elect Joe Biden’s incoming team helped shape some of the most militaristic policies of the Obama administration, which is a very worrisome sign.

Biden comes with a long political career of supporting the wars of the United States and its allies, from the 2003 invasion of Iraq to Israel’s aggression against Palestinians to the protracted occupation of Afghanistan.  

Whatever limited overtures he made to the Left during his campaign for election in 2020, while he simultaneously ran on distancing himself from the Left, foreign policy was almost entirely omitted, as was evidenced by the issue’s exclusion from the unity task force with Bernie Sanders.

While Biden did say during his campaign that he wants to end ‘forever wars’ (many of which he helped start) and that he’s against the war in Yemen, recent appointments indicate he is drawing from a host of pro-war individuals to fill his cabinet.

Antony Blinken • Nominated for the role of Secretary of State, he has rightfully  attracted considerable attention for a record of supporting wars and so-called ‘humanitarian interventions. Blinken was a top aide to Biden when he voted to authorize the U.S. invasion of Iraq and helped Biden develop a proposal to partition Iraq into three separate regions based on ethnic and sectarian identity. As deputy national security advisor, Blinken supported the disastrous military intervention in Libya in 2011 and in 2018 helped launch West Exec Advisors, a strategic advisory firm secretive about its clients, but according to an investigation conducted by In These Times includes a large client base at the intersection of tech and defense.

But other, lesser-known Obama administration alumni deserve greater scrutiny. Among them is Avril Haines, who has been tapped as Biden’s Director of National Intelligence. Haines was one of the co-authors of Obama’s ​“presidential policy guidance’ -  the infamous drone play­book that normalized  targeted assassinations around the world. Here’s how Newsweek described Haines in 2013:

Since becoming the National Security Council’s legal adviser in 2011, she had been working on a wide array of highly complicated and legally sensitive issues — generally until 1 or 2 in the morning, sometimes later — that go to the core of U.S. security interests. Among them were the legal requirements governing U.S. intervention in Syria and the range of highly classified options for thwarting Iran’s nuclear program.

All the while, Haines was sometimes summoned in the middle of the night to weigh in on whether a suspected terrorist could be lawfully incinerated by a drone strike.

During the Biden presidential campaign, there was a concerted effort by former Obama aides to cast Haines retroactively as a voice of restraint and protecting civilians, as captured in an article by Spencer Ackerman. This revisionism should not be believed: Whatever civilian protections Haines may have written into drone law, they clearly did not work, as evidenced by the devastating toll of U.S. drone wars on civilians.

While the Trump administration escalated the drone war and loosened restrictions on killing civilians, it was the Obama adminitration — aided by Haines — that normalized the wide­spread use of targeted assassinations that turned the whole world into a potential U.S. battlefield.

There are other aspects of Haines’ record that are worrying. She has ​“in the past described herself as a former consultant for the controversial data mining firm Palantir,” as Murtaza Hussain reported for The Intercept. Palantir was co-founded by a Trump backing billionaire, and is implicated in some of the worst wrong doings of the Trump administration, including mass surveillance and immigrant detention. As Hussain reports, little is known about Haines’ role at the firm, and she scrubbed any mention from her bio when she came on as a Biden advisor. (Haines also worked for West Exec, as Guyer reports.)

In 2018, Haines angered progressives when she spoke in support of Gina Haspel’s nomination for CIA Director. Haspel was widely opposed for her role in running CIA prisons where torture took place.

And then there is Linda Thomas Greenfield, tapped to serve as United Nations Ambassador. Thomas Greenfield lists her most recent employment Albright Stonebridge Group, a secretive​“global strategy firm” somewhat similar to McKinsey & Company, and chaired by Madeleine Albright (Thomas Greenfield is currently listed as ​“on leave” from the firm). Albright Stonebridge Group is a black box: It’s near impossible to get any info about who its clients are. The firm claims that it does not lobby the U.S. government or do work that is covered by the Foreign Agents Registration Act, but many of its staffers double in roles that certainly do exert influence, or have in the past. The firm’s UAE office is headed by Jad Mneymneh, who previously was in the Crown Prince Court of Abu Dhabi’s Office of Strategic Affairs.

There is noth­ing remarkable about Biden appointing someone who hails from a shadowy global strategy firm for a powerful role, but that is precisely the problem. As Guyer points out, Jake Sullivan, set to be Biden’s National Security Advisor, went to work for Macro Advisory Partners in 2017. ​“Run by former British spy chiefs, Macro Advisory Partners has about 30 full-time staff and reported $37 million in revenue last year,” notes Guyer.​“Macro Advisory Partners has used Sullivan’s involvement as a selling point in offering ​‘trusted counsel in a turbulent world,’ with his face atop the roster on their website’s landing page. But when Sullivan publishes a magazine article about U.S. foreign policy or delivers university lectures, he almost always omits this job from his biography.

Then there is Michèle Flournoy, considered the favorite to lead the Pentagon (though this hasn’t been officially announced yet). Not only is she on the board of military contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, but she co-founded the hawkish center-left think tank Center for a New American Security (CNAS) — which receives significant funding from the weapons industry, including General Dynamics Corporation, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman Corporation and Lockheed Martin.  She served in the Obama administration as Under Secretary of Defense for Policy from 2009 to 2012 and then played a powerful role at CNAS. She was a major backer of the 2011 military intervention in Libya, a supporter of the occupation of Afghanistan, and firmly opposed the complete removal of U.S. troops from Iraq.

One third of Biden’s Pentagon transition team alone lists as their ​“most recent employment” think tanks, organizations or companies that are either funded by the weapons industry or are directly part of this industry. Many of these entities are well-known and even respected, including influential think tanks like CNAS and the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Staffers of these think tanks do not get the same bad flak that lobbyists receive, but they deserve it: Via policy papers, media out­reach and relationships with politicians, these staffers effectively do the same thing lobbyists do, but dressed in a more academic veneer, and the think tanks Biden is drawing from have proven track records of pushing weapons systems on the U.S. government. Indeed, in 2016 even the New York Times accused CSIS of lobbying for General Atomics, a California based manufacturer of Predator drones, based on a cache of emails showing it doing just that. And then there are the many that do not disclose their funders, including for transition team members (Linda Thomas-Greenfield among them) who hail from Albright Stonebridge Group.

Obama, with Biden at his side, oversaw intervention in Libya, disastrous involvement in the Yemen war, ongoing occupation in Afghanistan, support for the coup in Honduras, and much more. And Biden is now pulling from the same team of advisors and influence peddlers and consultants who helped make it all happen.

 

Comments

Please login to comment

LOGIN

Events

Current Issue

Login

Don't have an account?

CREATE AN ACCOUNT