Government
Spending:
The Biggest
Fiasco Behind Michigan's Budget Crisis
Editor's
Note:
Last issue we published a guest column
by State Representative Ken Horn concerning the
expansion of Michigan's sales tax to service
oriented businesses and the debilitating effect this
will have on Michigan's economy, especially insofar
as the budget deficit could be readily fixed through
a combination of outsourcing, eliminating government
waste, and ridding ourselves of the perks awarded to
government officials, which are among the third
highest paid in the country.
As we go to press,
the Legislature is still conflicted over how to
reduce spending. Insofar as the 'devil is in the
details', we once against asked Representative Horn
to inform our readers about how spending issues were
being addressed in Lansing.
We received this
update 24-hours before press time, with yet another
government shutdown looming on the horizon.
Treat, or
TRICK?
by State
Representative
Kenneth Horn
As the month end
approaches, I want to bring you up to date on what's
happening with the state budget in Lansing. With a
shutdown averted last month, many residents believed
a final budget was in place. Not True.
Taxes were raised,
the prior year's budget was extended for one month,
and a promise was made to make $440 million in
cuts before we passed final budgets for all
state departments.
Is progress being
made to meet the October 31st deadline and get
budgets in place? Yes. But my issue with the $440
million in "cuts" is that they are being
accomplished by taking out new programs instead of
reducing state spending.
The Governor had
wanted $196 million for new all day
pre-school for some - that's off the table now and
included in the so-called cuts. AndŠ they still
want to discuss a proposal to increase hunting and
fishing fees, which doesn't sound very much like a
cut to me.
"No new spending" should be a given in this economy,
but there's more to it. We need to fix our true
structural spending problem, not just eliminate new
programs. We should be giving the taxpayers REAL
cuts - - real spending reductions. And, I'll say it
again - it can be done rather painlessly.
It goes back to my Two-Penny Plan - - we
begin by cutting two cents from every dollar we
spend on our state departments. It's much more
compassionate to trim 2% from the top of every
bureau in Lansing than to propose cutting half of
our funding for libraries, or even 6.25% from
indigent healthcare proposed earlier this year. We
don't need to pull the ax out of the chopping block;
all we need is a scalpel to scrape the surface.
It bothers me greatly
that our front line teachers, police and
firefighters consistently face layoff threats when
we have nearly 2500 state employees who earn over
$80,000, with salaries going as high as
$162,000. Why are troopers, conservation
officers and teachers under attack when every one of
us should share this burden equally?
Think about itŠ this
administration laid off 29 troopers last
spring. At the very same time, candidates who ran
for elected office, and lost, were just settling
into newly created positions appointed by the
Governor. Trooper's unions were paying out cash
from their own reserves to protect their members,
while new appointees were snuggling into their cozy
$85,000 per year, plus benefits, jobs across the
state.
The Real Fix
My fix, of course, begins with the Horn Two Penny
Plan: for every dollar we spent last year, we spend
98 cents this year. Both pennies need to come out of
the very top of the bureaucracy, with no threats to
frontline services as we've experienced already this
year. Again, if two pennies isn't too much to tax my
constituents, then it can't be too much to save on
their behalf.
And, yesŠ I recognize
the difference between the general fund, restricted
spending, and the federal dollars Michigan receives.
But, Lansing's stubborn bureaucratic groupthink is
strangling this state's economy. A decline in the
auto industry isn't the only thing that is causing
our state to be dead last in our nation's economic
recovery. Finger-pointing to previous
administrations and Washington D.C. isn't required
of the 40 some states that are trying to figure out
what to do with their budget surpluses this year.
The two penny plan
would require tough leadership, but would save this
state an estimated $900 million per year -
plenty enough to repeal the new sales tax on
services.
Once the budget is stable, the state needs to revise
its employee pay-grade system. I have a benchmark
study on my desk showing that Michigan ranks number
one in the speed in which an employee goes from
starting pay to the top of the pay scale. This
causes our administrative budgets to be extremely
top heavy. The rate of rising to the very top needs
to better reflect the current economic job climate.
Once we make these
changes for new employees, the state needs to be
extraordinarily creative in offering early out
incentives to our dedicated employees. Early
retirements, and cash buyouts of long and expensive
contracts, need to be considered again.
Organizational charts
need to be dramatically revised and permanently
changed to reflect our modern government. The
administration points out that it is down to
52,000 employees, however, the 2008
budget has money set aside for 57,000 state
employees. We need to redistribute the dollars
set aside for these 5,000 unfilled positions and use
current resources to get the work done.
We need to privatize
more services, rather than compete for top talent
with the private sector. While some services need to
remain in the hands of state government, others
might be better served in the hands of the experts
outside of our steep bureaucracy. As I said before,
we have nearly 2,500 hundred employees that earn
$80k plus benefits, with many at $100k plus. We pay
these people top dollar and say we are "competing
with wage scales in the private sector", and then
demean the private sector as not being a viable
option for government services.
The bottom line is
that this government should be lean and nimble -
ready to respond appropriately to any new economic
change.
Another example is
the situation with the Department of Natural
Resources. Voters have approved ballot measures
in past elections dedicating funds to our parks &
natural resources.
Once again, there are
48 people at the top of the DNR pay scale
making $80,000 plus benefits. Twelve of these
department heads make $100k+. Before they lay
off fourteen front line conservation officers and
close 37 parks, the organization needs a true
top-down shake up. We all need to share equally in
our down times.
This new service tax
is an attack on the small budding entrepreneurial
class, willing to work hard, but with very little
capital for business start-ups. This new sales tax
on services is not only onerous, but also
frightening in the face of today's economy in
Michigan.
And, it flies in the
face of the very American Dream that brought both my
parents and my grandparents to this country.
With or without a
replacement, this tax must be repealed. Now!