Home  |  Out & About  |  Dining  |  Events  |  Singles  |  Classifieds  |  Archive  |  Advertising


 

Law Enforcement Officers Clarify Position on Plan to Curb
Alcohol Related Fatalities
By Robert E. Martin
On Sunday, January 27th, the headline on the front page of The

Saginaw News boldly proclaimed 'Police Target Tavern Owners'.

The story went on to state businesses that serve alcohol to intoxicated

patrons face closer scrutiny under a plan that would "likely involve

dedicating at least two officers to identifying and ticketing those

businesses."
The plan was purportedly the concoction of Saginaw County Sheriff Charles

L. Brown and State Police 1st Lt. Mark Soffin, commander of the Bridgeport

Post, and was allegedly in response to an increase in fatalities that

claimed 34 lives in Saginaw County last year, half of which were alcohol

related.
In recent years, increased penalties and lower levels that define 'legal

intoxication' have prompted the majority of tavern owners to train

employees in techniques of alcohol management, or at a minimum, phone for a

cab if a patron has consumed one drink too many.
With the majority of tavern & restaurant owners establishing good and

responsible relationships with law enforcement, the announcement came as a

surprise to many.
Given the need to balance public safety with the cultivation of viable

business and entertainment outlets in Saginaw County, this approach of

planned "selective enforcement" was a shocker to tavern & restaurant

owners, as well as patrons.

Apart from being potentially illegal on the basis of selective prosecution

and entrapment, the message being sent was a fearful one.
"The economy is difficult enough without adding to our problems," commented

one owner.  "The Westside Business District is comprised mainly of taverns

& restaurants and is the last viable commercial base that the City of

Saginaw has left," commented another. "How can economic development and

growth of an entertainment district occur with this type of climate?"
While all owners we spoke to agreed that responsibility is paramount, and

that added training for staff offered in the plan was a welcomed solution,

they also pointed out that there is only so much a person can do.
"At some point it comes down to the individual," noted one owner. "Some

people can be legally intoxicated, yet hold their liquor very well.  Short

of installing a Breathalyzer in each establishment, what are we supposed to

do?   If somebody goes to a pharmacy and buys a prophylactic and it breaks

on them and a girl gets pregnant, does that make the pharmacist liable?"
Over the Top Reporting?
When the Review prepared to follow-up on this planned new agenda, our

thought was to interview Soffin, Brown, tavern owners, and patrons.

Indeed, one owner informed us that WNEM-TV5 was working on a response from

tavern owners for Take Five.
But when the piece didn't air, we got suspicious.  A phone call to reporter

Janis Utley, who was working on the piece, set off a disturbing alarm.
"We cancelled the story because it wasn't true," commented Utley. "I spoke

with Mark Soffin at the Bridgeport Post and he indicated that the Saginaw

News story was written out-of-context.  Apparently they don't have a budget

to dedicate two police officers to target taverns. I put a call out to

Sheriff Brown, but he hasn't returned my calls."
A phone call to Soffin confirmed this.

"I was very disappointed in that article," commented Lt. Soffin. "Sheriff

Brown and I talked about many options for addressing this problem of

intoxication, and dedicated officers was just one of them.  Frankly, given

the state budget crisis, dedicated officers is a costly proposition."
"We don't want to send the wrong signal out by minimizing the problem,"

continued Soffin, "because we do intend to increase public awareness about

the problem, especially among younger adults.  And we welcome all

cooperation from establishments in terms of furthering alcohol awareness

training among their employees, but we are not targeting some massive

crackdown."

When Sheriff Charles Brown was contacted about the piece, he echoed

Soffin's sentiments.
"The headline was a bit much," commented Brown, "because that was just one

component of our plan.  Actually, what we intend to do is ask people that

we do arrest for drunk driving to identify where it is that they've been

drinking."

"We do know of a couple places that have a history for problems," continued

Brown, "and we do intend to address those establishments.  But no, we are

not going to dedicate officers to constant surveillance of all the

restaurants, taverns, and entertainment districts in the area."

"Drinking is a serious problem," continued Brown, "and we simply want the

public to be aware of the consequences.  If you've had too much to drink,

it is much cheaper to call for a $30.00 cab ride than suffer the

consequences of a DUIL or possibly losing your job and livelihood."
Balance Is the Key
When the Review contacted Saginaw News reporter LaNia Coleman about the

piece she had written, her response was one of surprise.
"I wrote what they told me," she commented.
Obviously, the citizens of Saginaw County wish to have a safe community to

live, but they also need to be able to enjoy the entertainment, dining, and

cultural activities offered throughout their community without living in a

shroud of fear.
In order for a democracy to function, all the players & participants must

act responsibly.
The variety of entertainment offered in the clubs throughout Saginaw County

has blossomed greatly in recent years.
Balancing the legitimate interests that often compete within a community is

of crucial importance.
And the last thing we need is 'over-reaction' to a situation or problem

that can be readily solved through commitment, understanding, and

cooperation.

 

Enable frames
 

home  |  out/about  |  events  |   personal  |  store  |  classified  |  real estate  |   forums  |  archives  |  contact
© 2009 Review Magazine.  All rights reserved.

Enable frames