|
State House 94th District Candidate Forum:
One Candidate Responds, One is Silent
By M. Thompson
Job creation, tax policy, budget cuts, education and the environment are among
top issues in the 94th District campaign for the Michigan House of
Representatives.
Incumbent Republican Ken Horn of Frankenmuth is seeking his second
two-year term in the election on November 4th. He is facing the same foe
he defeated in 2006, Democrat Bob Blaine of Swan Creek Township.
The duo served for 12 years together on the Saginaw County Board of
Commissioners. They squared off for the open State Rep seat in 2006
because the
GOP's Dr. Roger Kahn stepped up to win his post in the Senate.
Republicans have an edge in the 94th District because the territory is mostly
rural. The City of Frankenmuth is included, along with 12 townships.These
townships are Albee, Birch Run, Blumfield, Chesaning, Frankenmuth, James, Maple
Grove, Saginaw, St. Charles, Swan Creek, Taymouth and Thomas.
Prior to the 2006 election, candidates Horn and Blaine both availed themselves
to the generous space that Review Magazine continues to provide for
candidate forums. We offer these Q&A sessions despite a distressing growth of
apathy for local elections. (Example: City of Saginaw voter turnout for the
August primary was 12 percent.)
We also are distressed that Bob Blaine has seen fit to decline
participating this time around in 2008. Therefore, you the reader will see
responses only from Ken Horn on the vital issues in state government that
affect your well-being here in Saginaw County.
We wish to provide a full explanation, so that no reader will perceive bias in
regard to this publication. Bob Blaine answered his home telephone on
September 10 and provided his e-mail to accept our modest list of forum
questions. He was provided nine days to respond. If he felt he did not have time
to write or type his responses, we offered to transcribe for him, in a process
that would have required about 15 minutes of his valuable time.
Four telephone calls were placed to former Commissioner Blaine's home during the
final three days of the deadline. We also went what might be termed beyond the
call of duty, because we telephoned Saginaw County Democratic Party headquarters
in an attempt to make a connection. Again, this was a fruitless quest.
Apparently we are not alone.
The Saginaw News
reported in March that when Blaine filed his nominating petitions, he said his
first goal was to create jobs, but that "he declined to elaborate or comment on
other priorities."
Ken
Horn,
49, is a former small business owner who was vice president of the non-profit
Saginaw Community Foundation until his election two years ago.
Bob Blaine,
56, is a Hemlock High School special education teacher and a family farmer.
It is difficult for a grassroots publication such as Review Magazine to promote
more voter participation, when candidates themselves do not cooperate in airing
their views.
We hope readers will see that we took all steps in our power (except for calling
Mr. Blaine's home in the middle of the night) to provide you with balanced
information.
Following is a forum that we wish could have featured both candidates.
Review: Please outline your priorities for state government during the next
two years.
Horn: Continuing our work to create a competitive economic climate is
vitally important. A leading priority for every Michigan citizen should be
restoring our economic health and creating jobs. Strategies to expand
Hemlock Semiconductor, welcome TRW , and restructure Delphi
will mean high-paying, highly skilled jobs for Saginaw County residents.
The 21st Century Energy Plan that we are working on to provide greater
energy independence is estimated to result in $20 billion dollars in new
construction and 16,000 new construction jobs. This is a result of a very
strong bipartisan effort from our Tri-County legislative team. I believe in
friendship above partisanship. (Editor's Note: The energy Bill Horn
references will also create greater monopolization and an estimated increase in
residential rates of up to 10 percent).
Blaine: No response.
Review: Would you cut the state budget? If so, in what way?
Horn: I would cut the state budget. Readers of this magazine will
remember the Horn Two-Penny Plan, which proposed trimming 2 cents from
every dollar of state spending. This is a temperate approach to managing
administrative costs, and requires Michigan government to live within its means.
I was outraged in the spring of 2007 that 19 state troopers were laid off, and
not one person at the top of the pay scale even had to worry about a higher
co-pay for their health insurance. I support a reasonable approach that
does not cut front-line services, and one where all departments share the burden
of cutting back equally.
Blaine: No response.
Review: Would you increase any area of the state budget? If so, how would you
pay for it?
Horn: Only by way of resetting our priorities. One of my objectives is
to put more dollars directly into classrooms as opposed to overhead costs, but
the bottom line should remain the same. I support prioritizing public
safety, public education and infrastructure - things that government
should be responsible for.
Blaine: No response
Review: Would you propose any reforms in education, either K-12 or higher
education?
Horn: It's well known that one of the key elements of high school success
for at-risk students is early childhood education. Some of the legislation
that I've written focuses on the preschool ages, zero-to-5, when a child is most
apt to absorb learning. Many educators feel that life patterns are set by
the time kids get to middle school.
Another objective of mine is legislation that reduces truancy. Individuals
without a high school diploma are less likely to hold a steady job and often
aren't able to advance in their careers. Combating truancy increases our
capacity for productivity, and reduces the burden on our criminal justice
system.
Blaine: No response.
Review: Does the Legislature need to enact any new initiatives in terms of
the environment?
Horn: Earlier this year we passed the Great Lakes Water Compact,
which still needs approval by Washington. It is now important for all
Michigan residents to encourage Congress to affirm the compact that the Great
Lakes states have put in place. The votes I cast this summer will protect
our lake and groundwater system from extraordinary water withdrawal.
As a member of the House Energy and Technology
Committee, I've been working this year on a package of bills to encourage
renewable energy and energy efficiency programs. In doing so we increase
our energy independence, create jobs, and move toward green energy solutions.
What intrigues me is the opportunity to take traditional manufacturing and bring
it into the 21st century. For instance, if we can bend sheet metal for car
fenders, we can certainly do it for wind turbines.
Blaine: No response.
Review: What are key areas in which you disagree with your opponent?
Horn: We disagree in terms of taxation, spending and government
regulation. Two years ago, for instance, higher taxes were among my
opponent's solutions. My solutions were based on government reform,
stopping new spending, restructuring old spending and requiring Michigan
government to live within its means. My constituents sit at the kitchen
table making tough budget decisions every day. They should accept no less
from their government officials.
Blaine: No response.
Review: Do you believe your opponent has misquoted or misportrayed your views in
any way?
Horn: It's hard to tell. In the only forum that we have shared
together my opponent was cut off by the moderator for negative and
partisan remarks. This is my 9th campaign for public office, and I've been
successful in maintaining a very positive decorum in all my debates. I
have great respect for anyone who enters the rough and tumble arena of politics
even if they choose to challenge me. Bob is, after all, still one of my
constituents and deserves my respect and regard as a resident of the 94th
District.
Blaine: No response.
Review: How much do you plan to spend on this campaign? Please be specific. How
much of this money will come from your state political party?
Horn:
So far I've raised roughly $40,000 and am on track to raise the $50,000 that I
expected to spend. Because they feel my local campaign is strong and
healthy, it's likely that I won't receive much financial help from my party
unless it's required. I am so fortunate that I have a wide base of local
support, and we're still inviting people to join our cause in restoring Michigan
and this region to its former glory.
Blaine: No response.
|